w00t! First cult thread within 9622!
Who here likes pancakes? I like pancakes.
Posted by: yhbc at May 9, 2002 11:46 PMWhat's that monkey doing to that ... hang on ... what's that thing it's doing it to, anyway?
Posted by: walrus at August 1, 2002 01:30 PMThat was a study, no? The one that showed that baby monkeys would be attracted to and spend time with the cuddly robot as opposed to the robot that gave it only nourishment, but was just a robot. This robot had snuggly carpeting, so the monkey would get food from the other robot, but spend all kinds of time with this robot.
Posted by: adampsyche at August 1, 2002 01:42 PMActually, I thought about this later, and I think it's one of those studies where they raise a chimpanzee away from its mother to demonstrate either how monkeys need touch to develop into executives or how doctors really like to mess with monkeys' heads.
Either way, unfortunate.
Posted by: kafkaesque at August 1, 2002 01:48 PMOr, you know, what Adam said.
Posted by: kafkaesque at August 1, 2002 01:49 PMI have this picture in my Abnormal Pysch book from lo those many years ago at university. Excerpted: The Ethics of Research - Methodology Case Study source text: adapted from Giddens, and Atkinson et. al.
Harry Harlow experimented in socialisation in the 1950s and 1960s by taking baby rhesus monkeys from their mothers. All material needs were provided for the baby monkeys, they were fed and given all they needed materially.
The baby monkeys which were brought up in isolation from other monkeys behaved in a very bizarre and unusual way. When they were introduced to other monkeys, they were hostile or fearful and they refused to interact. They spent their time huddling in the corners of their cages and their posture was not dissimilar from that of humans who experience schizophrenia.
The monkeys could not, or would not mate with other monkeys. Some females were impregnated by artificial insemination, but they did not pay attention to their young. Monkeys raised in partial isolation where they could see other monkeys, but could not interact were also unable to mate correctly. They did however masturbate which showed that normal sexual function was in fact present.
Harlow refined his experiment to see if the mother was essential to the develop of the social behaviour of the monkey. He brought up the babies in age group cohorts, without access to adults who would provide a substitute mother. These monkeys all behaved in a normal monkey manner. Monkeys were reared in cages with feeders attached to substitute mothers.
Each baby monkey had two model mothers, wire and terry cloth. In groups, some wire mothers were rigged to provide food, and some wire mothers were rigged to provide food. In all cases, the baby monkey preferred the cloth mother regardless of which provided food.
Posted by: dejah420 at August 1, 2002 01:57 PMIs this like when you go into a worm-hole and end up in an alternate universe? Where am I? I feel all funny inside....
Posted by: readymade at October 25, 2002 10:14 PMNo, really, how did I end up here? I was minding my own business, posting meaningless drivel to the Chef-aganza, and *poof* I'm here.
Posted by: readymade at October 25, 2002 10:16 PMSometimes, the beginning is the middle.
Other times, the end is the middle.
Sometimes noon is half past six.
Do you see?
Posted by: kafkaesque at October 25, 2002 10:31 PMAnd the clocks will all run backwards
and all the sheep will have two heads
and Thursday night on Friday will come on Tuesday night instead.
I just put comments in wherever the hell I feel like it anyway.
Posted by: anathema at October 25, 2002 11:58 PMCos he's a loner, Dottie, a rebel....
Posted by: jonmc at October 25, 2002 11:59 PMI thought it was Ashley Montague(?)...oh well, at least the baby monkey's happy-ish....
Posted by: amberglow at October 26, 2002 01:05 PMThat's right mcjon, a 2 demensional (or is that dement-ional) rebel!
Posted by: anathema at October 26, 2002 01:34 PMdimensional
Posted by: anathema at October 26, 2002 02:29 PMThe study of law is inversely proportional to quality spelling and grammar.
Posted by: anathema at October 26, 2002 02:31 PMI just found out that I will be unemployed stating Dec 20.
way to fuck up the holidays.
Posted by: tj at November 19, 2002 11:36 AMSorry to hear that, tj. Here's hoping better things come your way...
Posted by: pardon me at November 19, 2002 11:51 AMSorry to hear about your job. Perhaps we should adopt a Monkey Named TJ for Christmas?
Posted by: witchstone at November 19, 2002 12:49 PMThat ain't right. Let's get the Punching Nun puppet from the other thread, and go whoop the bastards.
Posted by: tizzie at November 19, 2002 01:32 PMSUCKY
Posted by: anathema at November 19, 2002 01:45 PMeh, I was just doing the math, it's not so bad. I'll be getting my last check just in time to blow it all on hookrs and booze for New Year's.
Posted by: tj at November 19, 2002 02:12 PMHookers, and booze, and the dole, oh my! My condolences, brother tj.
Posted by: readymade at November 19, 2002 02:34 PMAlso please send any leftover hookers and booze that you find in the back of the closet to tj. The Salvation Army doesn't appreciate them enough.
Posted by: liam at November 19, 2002 02:50 PMDude, that sucks. Anyone you want me to "take care of" to prevent that from happening? I watch the Sopranos. I think I know how it's done.
Posted by: eyeballkid at November 19, 2002 02:56 PMTalk about suckage. Please don't throw yourself off a bridge TJ. I'm sure we can keep them from foreclosing on the bank somehow.
Posted by: octobersurprise at November 19, 2002 03:02 PMAnd don't let Michael Jackson dangle you off a balcony with a towel over your head, either!
Posted by: witchstone at November 19, 2002 03:37 PMwell kids, it's a totally different situation that what happened to me this time last year. I knew it was coming this time and I have no hard feelings the budget is not so good here. There is a chance for an 11th hour contract to come up.
I'm not even that upset. at least this time I'll be on the dole.
Posted by: tj at November 20, 2002 09:11 AMit scared the shite out of me!
Posted by: a towel at November 20, 2002 09:24 AMI tell you the baby probably thought it was it's one chance to get away.
Posted by: tj at November 20, 2002 09:36 AMTrue. In the MeFi thread that is currently in existence, someone wrote: "Well, on the positive side, if he's busy dangling them, he can't be molesting them." If it was anyone else, I'd say that was a low blow. In the case of MJ, I can only say "heh."
Posted by: pardon me at November 20, 2002 10:36 AMSorry to hear about your job, tj. That completely sucks.
Just look at it as a really long vacation. With no pay.
eh, I'm not worried. I've been through worse.
Posted by: tj at November 20, 2002 05:49 PMAll that working cuts into your drinking time anyway.
I'd like to officially declare this thread the "Someone's Getting Laid Off" thread for now and always.
Posted by: kaf at November 20, 2002 05:56 PMBut where's the "Someone's Getting Laid" thread?
Posted by: readymade at November 20, 2002 07:16 PMya know, I put it back here thinking no one would bother so I could just bitch about it semi-anonymously, forgetting about the whole recent comments thing.
sorry fellow monkeys.
I've been behaving myself for the past month too. I haven't really gone out but once since my birfday.
Posted by: tj at November 20, 2002 07:30 PMapologies not accepted! your simian brothers and sisters are here for you. Here, let me pick your fleas, tj.
Posted by: tizzie at November 20, 2002 08:06 PMtizzie, if your not busy, I've got a couple of nits that could use a little attention. You know, if you're available. No rush though.
Posted by: readymade at November 20, 2002 08:31 PMi love nitpicking! and I like to eat the little nitters after I pick 'em, too. mmmm.
Posted by: tizzie at November 20, 2002 08:34 PMTJ - we should take the opportunity to form our own band.
Posted by: Miguel at November 20, 2002 08:42 PMLadies and gentlemen - Live from the Copabanana - our velour-draped entertainers - give us a big hand for - Miguel y TayHota!
*wild applause*
*undies thrown into the orchestra pit*
I like it
Posted by: tj at November 20, 2002 10:35 PMHey--those were for me! *snatches panties*
Posted by: Tom Jones at November 21, 2002 09:26 AMno they weren't you washed up pantysnatch.
*snatches panties*
(pantysnatch, I like it becuase it sounds funny)
and it's funny cuz it's true!
Posted by: witchstone at November 21, 2002 12:22 PMOK, here's something random. Anyone who graduated circa 1991 remember a big assembly where they made you watch this slide show thing on 3 screens and they kept talking about "Shades" (as in sunglasses) and how everyone is different but we're all cool deep down, blah blah blah?
That just popped into my head. I think they did it at many schools across the country. Or maybe it was just a Maryland thing.
Posted by: witchstone at November 21, 2002 12:48 PMgraduated in '91 but I don't remember that. But there's alot about that year I'm probably blocking out of memory
Posted by: tj at November 21, 2002 12:55 PMgraduated in '91 but I don't remember that. But there's alot about that year I'm probably blocking out of memory
post dammit
Posted by: tj at November 21, 2002 12:56 PMOK, here's something random. Anyone who graduated circa 1991 remember a big assembly where they made you watch this slide show thing on 3 screens and they kept talking about "Shades" (as in sunglasses) and how everyone is different but we're all cool deep down, blah blah blah?
i remember something like that.
and a montel-style comedian who came in and told us you couldn't play basketball on acid.
we proved him wrong.
Posted by: fishfucker at November 21, 2002 02:04 PMClass of '91 Rulz!
Posted by: ColdChef at March 17, 2003 09:29 PMuh, cChef's been in the absinthe again.
Posted by: ufez at March 17, 2003 11:32 PMWHEEEEEE!
Happy birthday, 9622.net!
None of that "closed for archival purposes" shite here, thank God!
Posted by: Miguel at April 25, 2003 12:40 AMThat's because we don't care enough to archive.
Posted by: witchstone at April 25, 2003 09:08 AMMust you guys piss all over everything to mark your territory?
Jeezly Cripes.
Posted by: stavrosthewonderchicken at April 26, 2003 06:20 AMThe above was meant to be amusingly ironic, uh, that's all.
Posted by: stavrosthewonderchicken at April 26, 2003 09:53 PMJust curious, I see some weird layout when loading this blog using Mac OSX. Maybe it is only my problem.
Posted by: zipcodes at October 12, 2003 08:15 AMIt's not OS X, the problem is Safari.
Posted by: ana at October 12, 2003 12:13 PMactually, we just have a wierd layout
Posted by: tj at November 22, 2003 05:10 PM